On Monday, October 28, 2013 1:52 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Disable PCIe for SD5v1 board, because there is no PCIe slot
> > on SD5v1 board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Tested on SD5v1 board.
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-sd5v1.dts | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-sd5v1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-sd5v1.dts
> > index 5b22508..78a239d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-sd5v1.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-sd5v1.dts
> > @@ -36,4 +36,11 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > + pcie@290000 {
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + pcie@2a0000 {
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > };
>
> Usually IP blocks like these are always left disabled in the dtsi, and
> explicitly _enabled_ in the DTS on boards that make use of that part
> of the chip.
> So the real solution here should be to move the disabling to the 5440
> .dtsi instead.
OK, right.
Thank you for your guidance.
Then, do you mean the following?
If it is right, I will send the v2 patch.
./arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
pcie@290000 {
.....
status = "disabled";
};
pcie@2a0000 {
.....
status = "disabled";
};
./arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
pcie@290000 {
.....
status = "okay";
};
pcie@2a0000 {
.....
status = "okay";
};
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
