Hi Bartlomeij, Yes these patches have missed 2 merge windows and still not merged. Mike: I am re-basing these patches on linux-next. Please merge them. Regards, Amit On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Mike: > > Could you please apply this patch? It is few months overdue.. > > Amit: > > This patch no longer applies to -next. Could you please refresh and resend it? > > You can add: > > Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > while at it. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > -- > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:22:44 AM amit daniel kachhap wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> Please merge this patch as it is pending since last merge window. >> >> Thanks, >> Amit >> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> >> >> >> Now with common clock support added for exynos5250 it is necessary to move >> >> this code to exynos5250 common clock driver as clock registers should be >> >> handled there. This change is tested in exynos5250 based arndale platform. >> >> >> >> Cc: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Hmm...I'm not sure it's better to handle the ARM core power down clock in >> > common clock but the clock registers should be handled in one part, clock. >> > >> > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Mike, the mach-exynos/cpuidle.c is not touched in samsung tree at this >> > moment, so this patch will not create any conflict between samsung and clk. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > - Kukjin > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Mike: > > Could you please apply this patch? It is few months overdue.. > > Amit: > > This patch no longer applies to -next. Could you please refresh and resend it? > > You can add: > > Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > while at it. > > Thanks. > > Best regards, > -- > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > On Friday, August 16, 2013 10:22:44 AM amit daniel kachhap wrote: >> Hi Mike, >> >> Please merge this patch as it is pending since last merge window. >> >> Thanks, >> Amit >> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> >> >> >> Now with common clock support added for exynos5250 it is necessary to move >> >> this code to exynos5250 common clock driver as clock registers should be >> >> handled there. This change is tested in exynos5250 based arndale platform. >> >> >> >> Cc: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Hmm...I'm not sure it's better to handle the ARM core power down clock in >> > common clock but the clock registers should be handled in one part, clock. >> > >> > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Mike, the mach-exynos/cpuidle.c is not touched in samsung tree at this >> > moment, so this patch will not create any conflict between samsung and clk. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > - Kukjin > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |