Hi Arun, On Wednesday 09 of October 2013 09:21:43 Arun Kumar K wrote: > Hi Doug, > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Arun, > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> PLL35XX lock factor is 250 as per the manual whereas its > >> wrongly set as 270 now. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > I don't think this is right. I believe that it needs to be passed in > > by the SoC. On exynos5250 I see 250 in both the manual and in our > > code. On exynos5420 manual I actually see 200 now. I'm not actually > > sure where the 270 came from, now that I search for it. > > The manual I referred gives 250 for both 5250 and 5420 and thats why I > concluded on this fix. I will check other versions of the manual to see if > the value is changing. 270 is the value taken from Exynos 4412 User's Manual rev. 1.1. I believe we don't have to extend this to support per SoC value, because it should be always safe to take the value of SoC that requires the longest locking period. The differences are small enough to be insignificant, so there should be no practical performance penalty. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |