On 09/23/2013 03:41 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > Many backlights require a power supply to work properly. This commit > uses a power-supply regulator, if available, to power up and power down > the panel. I think that all backlights require a power supply, albeit the supply may not be SW-controllable. Hence, shouldn't the regulator be mandatory in the binding, yet the driver be defensively coded such that if one isn't specified, the driver continues to work? > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > @@ -253,6 +264,16 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > } > > + pb->power_supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "power"); ... so I think that should be devm_regulator_get(), since the regulator isn't really optional. > + if (IS_ERR(pb->power_supply)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(pb->power_supply) != -ENODEV) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(pb->power_supply); > + goto err_gpio; > + } > + > + pb->power_supply = NULL; If devm_regulator_get_optional() returns an error value or a valid value, then I don't think that this driver should transmute error values into NULL; NULL might be a perfectly valid regulator value. Related, I think the if (pb->power_supply) tests should be replaced with if (!IS_ERR(pb->power_supply)) instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html