Hi Tomasz,
On 5 September 2013 15:25, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chander,
>
> On Thursday 05 of September 2013 14:54:46 Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> Exynos5420 is octacore SoC from samsung.
>> Hence populate all the cpu node enteries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index e97c87b..59489f6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
>> @@ -57,6 +57,34 @@
>> reg = <0x3>;
>> clock-frequency = <1800000000>;
>> };
>> +
>> + cpu4: cpu@4 {
>
> I believe this is a typo. The @unit-address suffix should match the value
> of reg property.
No this is not typo. It is the MPIDR value of the cpu. (24 bits of
MPIDR register).
>
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
>> + reg = <0x100>;
>> + clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu5: cpu@5 {
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
>> + reg = <0x101>;
>> + clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu6: cpu@6 {
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
>> + reg = <0x102>;
>> + clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu7: cpu@7 {
>
> Ditto.
>
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
>> + reg = <0x103>;
>> + clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
>> + };
>> };
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
--
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
