Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-08-17 03:30:11) > Tomasz Figa wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically, this series looks good to me, but I'm not sure how this > > > > > > should be handled because of dependency with PWM cleanup and clk > > > > > > stuff > > > > > > in clk tree now... > > > > > > > > > > Patches 1-3 can go into the clk tree. 4-6 should go through their > > > > > respective trees. > > > > > > > > It looks like version 2 of patch 2/8 has been applied by mistake, > > > > breaking compilation (and operation) of the clock driver added in > > > > patch 3/8. > > > Ugh. My mistake. > > > > Happens. Thanks for fast response. > > > Sorry for late ;-) > > > > > Could you please fix this up? Thanks in advance. > > > > > > This is a little tricky since I published the clk-next-s3c64xx branch as > > > a stable branch for Samsung which I think has been merged to the > > > Samsung tree already. > > > > Right, this somewhat limits our options. Although I'm not really sure > > whether Kukjin already has pushed it to his public tree. > > > Yeah, I already did sort out in my local but not public tree because of some > problem. > > > > So what are the options? > > > > > > One option is to create a fixup patch that just manages the delta > > > between V2 and V3. I can then add this to the top of clk-next-s3c64xx > > > and re-merge it into clk-next. Then the Samsung tree will need to > > > re-merge that dependency branch. > > > > Well, I can make a "convert PLL65xx to new registration method" patch, > > that would be basically the delta. If this could be merged before patch > > 7/8, no regression would be introduced. > > > > > Do you have a better idea? > > > > Not really. Maybe let's ask Kukjin whether he has already merged it to his > > tree. Kukjin, have you? > > > OK, if new branch is ready, I will replace with that or if re-merge is > required, I will. Either way, I'm fine and can handle. Mike, let me know > your choice :-) Since I have already published it let's just go with the delta patch. I can create another stable branch named clk-next-s3c64xx-delta that just has this patch on top of clk-next-s3c64xx OR I can apply it on top of the existing clk-next-s3c64xx and re-merge it. I'm trying to think on whether there are any weird git corner cases with re-merging clk-next-s3c64xx. Let me know if re-merging is somehow unsafe (makes history weird, or whatever). Let me know what option is better for you. I'll publish as soon as I get the delta patch. Apologies again for creating some extra work! Thanks, Mike > > Thanks, > Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |