On 17 June 2013 17:08, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Chander Kashyap wrote: >> >> In preparation of adding support for Exynos5420, which has many >> peripherals >> similar to Exynos5250, a new common Exynos5 device tree source file is >> created out of the exising Exynos5250 device tree source file. Only the >> common nodes required for basic boot up on Exynos5420 based boards are >> moved >> into this new file and the rest of the common nodes would be moved >> subsequently. >> > Yeah, most of exynos5250 is used in exynos5420. Since created exynos5.dtsi > cannot support exynos5440 so that would be helpful if you could add some > comments in git log and codes about that. Sure, i will add comments regarding 5440. > >> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 111 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 68 +---------------------- >> 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..5684f89 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ >> +/* >> + * Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series common device tree source >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2012-2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. >> + * http://www.samsung.com >> + * >> + * Samsung's Exynos5 SoC series device nodes are listed in this file. >> Particular >> + * SoCs from Exynos5 series can include this file and provide values for >> SoCs >> + * specfic bindings. >> + * >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + */ >> + >> +#include "skeleton.dtsi" >> + >> +/ { >> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; >> + >> + chipid@10000000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-chipid"; >> + reg = <0x10000000 0x100>; >> + }; >> + >> + watchdog { >> + compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-wdt"; >> + reg = <0x101D0000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 42 0>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; > > I think, you put them by the address order. But as you know, some of them > are different with exynos5250 and exynos5420. So alphabetical ordering would > be helpful after putting core part. > So, chipid, gic, combiner and alphabetical ordering IPs... Ok i will re-order the nodes. > >> + >> + rtc { >> + compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc"; >> + reg = <0x101E0000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + combiner:interrupt-controller@10440000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-combiner"; >> + #interrupt-cells = <2>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + samsung,combiner-nr = <32>; >> + reg = <0x10440000 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0 0 0>, <0 1 0>, <0 2 0>, <0 3 0>, >> + <0 4 0>, <0 5 0>, <0 6 0>, <0 7 0>, >> + <0 8 0>, <0 9 0>, <0 10 0>, <0 11 0>, >> + <0 12 0>, <0 13 0>, <0 14 0>, <0 15 0>, >> + <0 16 0>, <0 17 0>, <0 18 0>, <0 19 0>, >> + <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>, <0 23 0>, >> + <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>, <0 26 0>, <0 27 0>, >> + <0 28 0>, <0 29 0>, <0 30 0>, <0 31 0>; >> + }; >> + >> + gic:interrupt-controller@10481000 { >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic", "arm,cortex-a9-gic"; >> + #interrupt-cells = <3>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + reg = <0x10481000 0x1000>, >> + <0x10482000 0x1000>, >> + <0x10484000 0x2000>, >> + <0x10486000 0x2000>; >> + interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>; >> + }; >> + >> + dwmmc_0: dwmmc0@12200000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc"; >> + interrupts = <0 75 0>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + dwmmc_1: dwmmc1@12210000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc"; >> + interrupts = <0 76 0>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + dwmmc_2: dwmmc2@12220000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dw-mshc"; >> + interrupts = <0 77 0>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + }; >> + >> + serial@12C00000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >> + reg = <0x12C00000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 51 0>; >> + }; >> + >> + serial@12C10000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >> + reg = <0x12C10000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 52 0>; >> + }; >> + >> + serial@12C20000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >> + reg = <0x12C20000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 53 0>; >> + }; >> + >> + serial@12C30000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >> + reg = <0x12C30000 0x100>; >> + interrupts = <0 54 0>; >> + }; >> +}; >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> index 0673524..2b59ea3 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> @@ -17,12 +17,11 @@ >> * published by the Free Software Foundation. >> */ >> >> -/include/ "skeleton.dtsi" >> -/include/ "exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi" >> +#include "exynos5.dtsi" >> +#include "exynos5250-pinctrl.dtsi" >> > I remember, to use #include is in Padma's patch and I've applied in my > local. So don't change it and just adding inclusion exynos5 is enough. Sure i will change it and use #include in exynos5.dtsi only. > > Others look good to me. Thanks for the review. > > Thanks, > - Kukjin > -- with warm regards, Chander Kashyap -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |