On Friday 07 June 2013, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Sounds fair to me. > > But when we talk about multiple domains we don't mean a disjoint range > bus bus numbers, as your other email shows: > > 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) > 10:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) > > We mean multiple domains, it should look like this: > > 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) > 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) > > ie lspci -D. > > Each domain gets a unique bus number range, config space, io range, > etc. This is much clearer to everyone than trying to pretend there is > only one domain when the HW is actually multi-domain. Yes, absolutely. This means we also don't need a bus-range property in DT, since each domain will allow all 255 buses. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |