Tomasz / Linus, On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes. I don't like the current way too much either, duplication being one > of the reasons. Do you have any other ideas? It sounds like Linus didn't like my suggestion and makes some good points... I don't have any other great ideas other than having an argument about whether the concept of pulls should be added to the GPIO subsystem (and backed by pinmux). Then we could make an argument that default pull state belonged in the GPIO specifier. OK, maybe we should just pretend that I didn't bring that up. ;) ...but I'm definitely interested in other ideas to eliminate the duplication. Until then I'm planning on submitting what I have locally. I'll probably send some version of it upstream fairly soon. I will probably submit without trying to get all the preprocessor symbols names done and will understand if Linus NAKs because of that. I don't have time to take that on at the moment but can always come back and rework that patch later. ;) -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |