Tomasz, On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This will be hard, since the phandle in interrupt-parent is represented by > an IRQ domain in kernel code. One-interrupt IRQ domains seem a bit awkward > to me. > > Since we are already going to modify the binding, let's think a bit more > about this problem and try to figure out a solution that doesn't add any > disadvantages (at least any significant) to avoid such situation in future > again. I'm definitely not super familiar with the implementation at that level of detail, so don't take my proposed syntax as something I've thought all the way through. ...but hopefully you understand what I'm getting at in terms of eliminating duplication? Thanks! :) -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |