Tomasz / Olof, On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Nothing stops you from doing that on your own. I tend to push back >> onto the maintainers to get them engaged in their own housekeeping, >> but anyone is free to :) I will probably leave this to the maintainers at this point... ;) >> Yeah, it should -- this is just in transition since 5440 was first out >> of the gate with pinctrl. > > AFAIK, Exynos5440 contains a completely different pin controller block, which > is not compatible with pinctrl-samsung driver, so I don't see any point of > moving it under PINCTRL_EXYNOS, which is currently used for Exynos 4210, 4x12 > and 5250, but will be also extended with driver data for S5PV210 as well. > > I'd say that CPU_EXYNOS4210, SOC_EXYNOS4212, SOC_EXYNOS4412 and SOC_EXYNOS5250 > should select PINCTRL_EXYNOS and SOC_EXYNOS5440 should be left as is, > selecting PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440. OK, sounds reasonable. I didn't dig into all of the details of the 5440 pin control driver and don't have a user manual in front of me. I will do as you say. New patch coming shortly. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |