Re: Exynos regressions w.r.t. config and debuggability due to multiplatform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:31:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 25 April 2013, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > 
> > On 04/25/13 00:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > >> I think we should hold off on multiplatform for exynos until it works
> > >> better, i.e. 3.11.
> > >>
> > I think, this would be better choice for now if it's not urgent...
> > 
> 
> I spent a lot of time on it because it's a priority for Linaro, but
> that means I'm biased in the question of whether to merge it or not.
> It should only get in if you and Olof think it's a good idea.

I've reverted the commit you pointed out as the problematic one now,
and with that I get a working setup. That means most of the base patches are
in, just not the final Kconfig shuffling. 3.11 seems more realistic for that.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux