On Tuesday 23 of April 2013 23:29:32 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 04/18/13 02:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>>> + vic0: interrupt-controller@71200000 {
> >>>
> >>> These nodes should be off a "simple-bus" node.
> >>
> >> Hmm, is there any reason behind it?
> >>
> >> I thought simple bus was just a convenient helper to represent
> >> hierarchical
> >> bus structures if one has a need to do so.
> >
> > No. The DT should reflect the bus structure of the chip. How
> > accurately it is done is up to you and the information available, but
> > you have to have a bus of some sort.
> >
> > There's obvious examples that don't follow this, but I'd like to not have
> > more.
> Tomasz, can you address comments?
Please discard this series for now.
I've decided to post it for 3.11, including a driver for Common Clock
Framework and several cleanup patches, which I have ready and waiting.
Best regards,
--
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
SW Solution Development, Kernel and System Framework
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
