On Thursday 11 April 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > These are the patches that I would like to apply directly to > the arm-soc next/multiplatform branch, unless you have any > objections. This would get all the simple stuff out of the > way, and I don't think there is a big risk of introducing > regressions with these. > > A lot of the other patches have already been merged into > subsystem trees. After this series in in arm-soc, what is > left comes down to > > * The ASoC conversion to dmaengine won't make it unless someone > who knows that code better steps up to do it right away. This > means that we won't have audio in a 3.10 multiplatform kernel > on Exynos, but it will still work for users that don't enable > multiplatform. > > * The irqchip (combiner), clk and clksource patches are all based > on top of other changesets we pulled in from your trees, so I > would not make them part of the next/multiplatform branch. We can > apply them on top of the next/drivers branch once they are > tested successfully. > > * A trivial patch is needed in the end to actually make > CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS visible in multiplatform configurations. > We will do that as a separate patch once everything else is > there. > > Please provide an ACK so I can put this into arm-soc, or let > me know if I screwed up somewhere. No reply? I'm putting them into the next/multiplatform branch now, with the exception of the i2c patch that is already in the i2c tree. I've tested this on the Arndale board and am putting it into the next/multiplatform branch now as a stepping stone for part two, which will be a late branch at best, if we decide to merge it in 3.10. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |