On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:35:58AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Tuesday 16 of April 2013 17:27:50 Mark Brown wrote: > > Strictly speaking this is a separate bug fix (though I see that's > > already in -next separately anyway so whatever). > Right. But this fix is so small that I thought it would be a major waste > of mail server processing power to send it as a separate patch. There's reviewer bandwidth too - one of the things people check for is that the change is doing what it's supposed to do, extra stuff in there is usually a red flag.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
