Naveen, On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Can some one review this and get this fix into the tree. I think the ball is in your court. Lars responded to your RFC patch here and requested that you do a reset of the bus in the case of being interrupted. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/5/91 I made a comment about perhaps just using non-interruptable and then shortening the timeout and Lars thought that would be OK. ...but I've since thought about it and I think Lars' suggestion is best. The reason I no longer like my suggestion of just using a 1ms non-interruptable tiemout is that I'm slightly worried about running into some case where the interrupt gets blocked for a while and then we get timeouts for no reasons. Perhaps I'm worrying over nothing, but Lars' suggestion doesn't have this issue. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |