On 04/10/13 22:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on
Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from
Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for
3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support
now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all.
I still have hope to get those included.
I agree and I asked Tomasz to re-send universal dt patch.
Not sure what's others opinion on that, and what would be an advantage
of removing non-dt support for Exynos now, rather than in 3.11, vs. any
possible inconvenience and regressions this could cause.
A multiplatform kernel will not work on an ATAGS based Exynos platform,
but I think we can have it both ways and allow either multiplatform
DT-only or single-platform with both DT and ATAGS in 3.10.
I think, if possible, keeping both way would be nice to us.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
