On 04/10/2013 02:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 10 April 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> On 04/10/2013 12:34 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> As we discussed in mailing list, non-DT for EXYNOS SoCs will not be >>>> supported from v3.10. This patch removes regarding files for non-DT >>>> including board files. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> It looks OK to me. > > Ok. I am currently rebuilding my exynos multiplatform series on top of the > branches merged yesterday, but keeping ATAGS support alive there. > > Should I rebase on top of this patch instead? Hmm, it turns out we are still actively using some boards based on Exynos4210 EVT0 SoCs. And since it seems unlikely the patches from Tomasz [1] adding basic DT support for those will get merged for 3.10, it would be a bit inconvenient to remove the ATAGS support now, leaving Exynos4210 Rev. 0 not supported at all. Not sure what's others opinion on that, and what would be an advantage of removing non-dt support for Exynos now, rather than in 3.11, vs. any possible inconvenience and regressions this could cause. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg235745.html Thanks, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |