On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 18 of March 2013 22:31:51 Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Since pinctrl-samsung is a common part of the pin control support for
>> several Samsung SoCs, it can be compiled without Exynos support enabled.
>>
>> This patch surrounds Exynos-specific driver data with ifdefs to include
>> them only when support for Exynos is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index b1d4ac8..f1fb562 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
>> @@ -968,10 +968,12 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev) }
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS4
>
> Oops... This should be CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS. It used to be EXYNOS4 in
> Kgene's tree (on which I usually base my patches) for some time, but it no
> longer is, but I forgot to change this during rebae.
>
> Linus, if remaining patches turned out to be OK, would you fix this when
> applying?
Fixed and applied.
Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
