On Monday 18 of March 2013 22:31:51 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Since pinctrl-samsung is a common part of the pin control support for
> several Samsung SoCs, it can be compiled without Exynos support enabled.
>
> This patch surrounds Exynos-specific driver data with ifdefs to include
> them only when support for Exynos is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c index b1d4ac8..f1fb562 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -968,10 +968,12 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) }
>
> static const struct of_device_id samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS4
Oops... This should be CONFIG_PINCTRL_EXYNOS. It used to be EXYNOS4 in
Kgene's tree (on which I usually base my patches) for some time, but it no
longer is, but I forgot to change this during rebae.
Linus, if remaining patches turned out to be OK, would you fix this when
applying?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
