Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> When running on an exynos 5250 SoC, we don't initialize the architected
> timers. The chip however supports architected timers.
>
Yes, exynos5250 can support, mct(multi core timer) is used though.
> When we don't initialize them, KVM will try to access them and run into
> NULL pointer dereferences attempting to do so.
>
Yes, right.
> This patch is really more of a hack than a real fix, but does get me
> working with KVM on Arndale.
>
Hmm, if you think, this is _really_ a hack, you need to add some comments
about that for clearance, and since the mct.c file has been moved into
drivers/clocksource/, this should be re-worked.
BTW, I discussed about this with Thomas and Giridhar just now, we reached
this 3rd patch could be dropped because the correct way is to add a dts
node for arch timer which patch 2nd is already doing after 3.9-rc1 because
of CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE macro.
So if you' OK above, let me know so that I can take only 1st and 2nd
patches to support KVM on exynos5250.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
> index c9d6650..eefb8af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
> @@ -482,4 +482,8 @@ void __init exynos4_timer_init(void)
> exynos4_timer_resources();
> exynos4_clocksource_init();
> exynos4_clockevent_init();
> +
> + if (soc_is_exynos5250()) {
> + arch_timer_of_register();
> + }
> }
> --
> 1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
