Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: EXYNOS5250: Register architected timers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.03.2013, at 20:07, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> On 14-03-2013 4:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
>> When running on an exynos 5250 SoC, we don't initialize the architected
>> timers. The chip however supports architected timers.
> 
>> When we don't initialize them, KVM will try to access them and run into
>> NULL pointer dereferences attempting to do so.
> 
>> This patch is really more of a hack than a real fix, but does get me
>> working with KVM on Arndale.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c |    4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
>> index c9d6650..eefb8af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mct.c
>> @@ -482,4 +482,8 @@ void __init exynos4_timer_init(void)
>>  	exynos4_timer_resources();
>>  	exynos4_clocksource_init();
>>  	exynos4_clockevent_init();
>> +
>> +	if (soc_is_exynos5250()) {
>> +		arch_timer_of_register();
>> +	}
> 
>   {} not needed here. scripts/checkpatch.pl should probabl;y warn about it.

Yeah, I'd leave it to whoever wants to apply this patch to remove the braces :). IMHO it's not worth it to respin just for this.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux