Re: RE: RE: RE: [PATCH v6 00/16] clk: exynos4/5: migrate to common clock framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-03-21 16:26:24)
> Mike Turquette wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > >
> > > > Furthermore if I *had* agreed on the previous version it would still
> > > > have been appropriate to put my Acked-by on those patches, which is
> > > > clearly missing today.
> > > >
> > > BTW, how about following?
> > >
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg210266.html
> > >
> > > In my understanding, it should be your agreement, it cannot be 'ack' though.
> > >
> > 
> > I had forgotten about that email from November.  Still my ack should
> > have been added.  If necessary I'll be painfully explicit in the future
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > about adding my acked-by.  It's a simple and good rule to follow.
> > 
> Yeah, I know. So if you want to add your ack on drivers/clk stuff for this series in samsung tree, please let me know.
> 

The patches are in pretty good shape.  Please add my ack if you are able
to rebase comfortably.  But if rebasing causes you and your downstream
users a lot of pain then don't do it.

Regards,
Mike

> Thanks, Mike.
> 
> - Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux