Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-03-19 17:00:09) > Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > > > Are you planning a V7 series which includes the clock alias bits from > > > > patch #1? > > > > > > Kukjin has already applied this series into the linux-samsung tree [0]. > > > > Thanks, Heiko. > > Mike, yes I did, as we discussed before. Since I missed in last window for v3.9, so I merged every common clock stuff for exynos into samsung tree in the early 3.9-rc time for v3.10. > > > > That really is too much code to go into drivers/clk without my ACK. I > > have not made much noise about this in the past but there has been more > > and more "bonus" code slipping into drivers/clk each merge window. > > Let's not do that any more. > > > > Hmm, I remember you already agreed on previous version, and I thought if any further codes are required, we could do it on top of that. > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/143429.html > In the email you linked to my use of the word "merged" did not imply an ACK. I was asking about merging the two separate exynos4 and exynos5 ccf development efforts together. Furthermore if I *had* agreed on the previous version it would still have been appropriate to put my Acked-by on those patches, which is clearly missing today. > However, if you don't want current codes to be sent to upstream, let me know, but I don't think it would be better to us though. No, I am not asking you to revert/drop the patches, but I am using this as a public example. Regards, Mike > > Thanks. > > - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |