RE: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: exynos: Initialise return variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sachin Kamat wrote:
> 
> 'ret' is undefined when the function returns from the first
> 'if' condition. Without this patch we get the following warning:
> 
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c: In function ‘exynos_target’:
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:182:2: warning:
> ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> 
> Suggested-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I modified above to 'Reported-by' because checkpatch complains like following...

WARNING: Non-standard signature: Suggested-by:
#10:
Suggested-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
Applied, thanks.

- Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux