Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Monday 21 of January 2013 12:21:41 Tushar Behera wrote: > > On 01/19/2013 04:10 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > Hi Kukjin, > > > > > > The commit message is a bit confusing, because it says that something > > > is being added, while in fact the whole node is being removed. > > > > > > Shouldn't it rather say something like: > > > ARM: dts: exynos5440-ssdk5440: Remove disabled status from watchdog > > > node > > Rather, should we not be following a consistent approach for both > > EXYNSO4 and EXYNOS5. > > > > In EXYNOS4, the default state of the nodes is 'disabled' and they are > > enabled in the board-specific files whereas it is exactly the opposite > > in case of EXYNOS5. > > Yes, I think we should eventually modify Exynos 5 to use the same approach > as Exynos 4. > Well, I know what you suggested and the way is used on exynos4 DT. But in the case of EXYNOS5440, all the peripherals are used on boards based on EXYNOS5440 SoC, so we can keep the peripherals available. Thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |