On Monday 21 of January 2013 12:21:41 Tushar Behera wrote: > On 01/19/2013 04:10 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > > > > The commit message is a bit confusing, because it says that something > > is being added, while in fact the whole node is being removed. > > > > Shouldn't it rather say something like: > > ARM: dts: exynos5440-ssdk5440: Remove disabled status from watchdog > > node > Rather, should we not be following a consistent approach for both > EXYNSO4 and EXYNOS5. > > In EXYNOS4, the default state of the nodes is 'disabled' and they are > enabled in the board-specific files whereas it is exactly the opposite > in case of EXYNOS5. Yes, I think we should eventually modify Exynos 5 to use the same approach as Exynos 4. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center SW Solution Development, Linux Platform -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |