Le 09/01/2013 20:26, Kukjin Kim a écrit : > On 01/08/13 13:00, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> Hi Romain, > > [...] > >>> What's wrong with this part of the patch ? >>> I applied this patch today on linux-next tree, branch next-20121214. >>> (with some hunk but no error) >> >> Patches that are supposed to go through Samsung (Kgene's) tree, should be >> based on for-next branch of Samsung tree. >> >> Do you have plans to rebase and resubmit this series again? I plan to >> submit some patches for S3C64xx (partly based on my historical work on >> this platform) and would be nice to have hrtime support already there, >> especially when all left is to just merge it. >> > Tomasz, thanks. > > As I said, this looks good to me, but, please re-submit this series > against on latest my for-next so that I can pick up in Samsung tree. I > couldn't apply due to too many conflicts :-( > > One more note, please add config option and inclusion by alphabetical > order rather than just replacing them. > > Thanks. > > - Kukjin Hi Kukjin and Tomasz, I reapplied this series of patches onto for-next branch. So, here are these patches in the following mails :) Thank you for your help. Romain -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |