Hi Romain, On Saturday 15 of December 2012 22:43:03 Romain Naour wrote: > Le 10/12/2012 13:59, Heiko Stübner a écrit : > > Am Sonntag, 2. Dezember 2012, 20:44:01 schrieb Romain Naour: > >> This patch rename s5p-time to samsung-time. > >> There is no functional change. > >> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Naour Romain <romain.naour@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The patch does not apply to current linux-next, because it has some > > problem with the exynos-universal board. I've fixed this to test the > > patch, so > > > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > > What's wrong with this part of the patch ? > I applied this patch today on linux-next tree, branch next-20121214. > (with some hunk but no error) Patches that are supposed to go through Samsung (Kgene's) tree, should be based on for-next branch of Samsung tree. Do you have plans to rebase and resubmit this series again? I plan to submit some patches for S3C64xx (partly based on my historical work on this platform) and would be nice to have hrtime support already there, especially when all left is to just merge it. Best regards, Tomasz Figa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |