On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 05:37:08PM -0800, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 04:33:29PM -0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > > Changes since v4: > > > - Rebased to linux-3.8-rc1. > > > > > > Changes since v3: > > > - Includes changes suggested by Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This patch series migrates the Samsung Exynos4 SoC clock code to adopt > > the > > > common clock framework. The use of Samsung specific clock structures has > > > been removed and all board support code has been updated. imx-style of > > > clock registration and lookup has been adopted for device tree based > > > exynos4 platforms. > > > > I'd prefer to see if exynos4 and 5 were kept common here, and both > > transitioned > > at the same time. Especially since there are no legacy boards for exynos5, > it > > would mean you could have a very clean transition there. What's the plan > to > > follow up with 5? > > > Yeah, I'm working on EXYNOS5250 common clk stuff and Thomas is working on > EXYNOS5440. So I think, we can move on exynos4 and 5 both common clk at the > same time. Note, EXYNOS5 common clk stuff will be submitted in the beginning > of Jan. As per the other reply, that sounds good -- it doesn't make sense to merge one without the other but it sounds like maybe they can both be ready in time for 3.9. > > What are the plans to remove legacy board files on exynos4 at this time > > and switch them to DT-only? You could do it gradually like Stephen Warren > > did on Tegra, with hooks that call out to some of the legacy code, but > > configure the board through device tree and do away with the classic > > machine descriptors, etc. > > > I had a plan to remove non-DT support on EXYNOS4 for v3.10, but if possible, > I will try to do it for v3.9. If any updates, let you know. There's no hurry, 3.10 is ok as a target as long as it's taking place. The main reason for why I was asking was that there was still some legacy board file updates posted, and that I hadn't seen much patches lately that made it obvious that there was an effort in that direction. 3.10 sounds like a good target. > Happy New Year! Thanks, you too. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html