Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 04:33:29PM -0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > Changes since v4: > > - Rebased to linux-3.8-rc1. > > > > Changes since v3: > > - Includes changes suggested by Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This patch series migrates the Samsung Exynos4 SoC clock code to adopt > the > > common clock framework. The use of Samsung specific clock structures has > > been removed and all board support code has been updated. imx-style of > > clock registration and lookup has been adopted for device tree based > > exynos4 platforms. > > I'd prefer to see if exynos4 and 5 were kept common here, and both > transitioned > at the same time. Especially since there are no legacy boards for exynos5, it > would mean you could have a very clean transition there. What's the plan to > follow up with 5? > Yeah, I'm working on EXYNOS5250 common clk stuff and Thomas is working on EXYNOS5440. So I think, we can move on exynos4 and 5 both common clk at the same time. Note, EXYNOS5 common clk stuff will be submitted in the beginning of Jan. > What are the plans to remove legacy board files on exynos4 at this time > and switch them to DT-only? You could do it gradually like Stephen Warren > did on Tegra, with hooks that call out to some of the legacy code, but > configure the board through device tree and do away with the classic > machine descriptors, etc. > I had a plan to remove non-DT support on EXYNOS4 for v3.10, but if possible, I will try to do it for v3.9. If any updates, let you know. Thanks. Happy New Year! - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html