On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:33 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
> > unsigned int off, samsung_gpio_pull_t pull)
> > {
> > @@ -599,7 +593,7 @@ static int samsung_gpiolib_4bit_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > con &= ~(0xf << con_4bit_shift(offset));
> > __raw_writel(con, base + GPIOCON_OFF);
> >
> > - gpio_dbg("%s: %p: CON now %08lx\n", __func__, base, con);
> > + pr_debug("%s: %p: CON now %08lx\n", __func__, base, con);
>
> Does your struct gpio_chip provide a valid dev pointer so you can use:
>
> dev_dbg(chip->dev, "%s: %p: CON now %08lx\n", __func__, base, con);
>
> In that case use the dev_* print macros everywhere instead.
>
No, a valid dev pointer is not provided yet.
After a valid dev pointer is available, I will change
pr_debug to dev_dbg.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
