On 13 October 2012 16:33, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Inderpal Singh > <inderpal.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The first 2 patches of this series fix memory leaks because the memory >> allocated for peripheral channels and DMA descriptors were not getting >> freed. >> >> The last 2 patches balance the module's remove function. >> >> This series depends on "61c6e7531d3b66b3 ........DMA: PL330: Check the >> pointer returned by kzalloc" which is on slave-dma's "fixes" branch. >> Hence slave-dma tree's "next" branch was merged with "fixes" and >> applied patch at [1] to fix the build error. >> >> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/24274 >> >> Changes since v1: >> - Protect only list_add_tail with spin_locks >> - Return EBUSY from remove if channel is in use >> - unregister dma_device in remove >> >> Inderpal Singh (4): >> DMA: PL330: Free memory allocated for peripheral channels >> DMA: PL330: Change allocation method to properly free DMA >> descriptors >> DMA: PL330: Balance module remove function with probe >> DMA: PL330: unregister dma_device in module's remove function >> >> drivers/dma/pl330.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> > All seem fine. > Acked-by: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> > Thanks Jassi. Vinod, I have tested this series against your latest slave-dma ->fixes branch which is based on 3.7-rc1. The patchset applies cleanly and works fine. Thanks, Inder > Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |