On Friday, September 28, 2012 3:48 PM Tomasz Figa wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 28 of September 2012 09:11:09 Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:45 PM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote
> > > > +Example:
> > > > +
> > > > +SOC specific portion:
> > > > + dptx_phy: dptx_phy@0x10040720 {
> > > > + compatible = "samsung,dp-phy";
> > > > + samsung,dptx_phy_reg =<0x10040720>;
> > > > + samsung,enable_bit =<1>;
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > > > + display-port-controller {
> > > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp";
> > > > + reg =<0x145B0000 0x10000>;
> > > > + interrupts =<10 3>;
> > > > + interrupt-parent =<&combiner>;
> > > > + dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
> > >
> > > Shouldn't it be "samsung,dp_phy" ?
> >
> > Do you mean this ? It is not working.
> > + dp_phy = "samsung,dp_phy";
>
> I believe he meant:
>
> -+ dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
> ++ samsung,dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
>
> to mark that this is a Samsung-specific property.
Oh, I see.
Yes, "samsung,dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>" is right.
As you mentioned, this is a Samsung-specific property.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Figa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
