Hi,
On Friday 28 of September 2012 09:11:09 Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:45 PM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote
> > > +Example:
> > > +
> > > +SOC specific portion:
> > > + dptx_phy: dptx_phy@0x10040720 {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,dp-phy";
> > > + samsung,dptx_phy_reg =<0x10040720>;
> > > + samsung,enable_bit =<1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + display-port-controller {
> > > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp";
> > > + reg =<0x145B0000 0x10000>;
> > > + interrupts =<10 3>;
> > > + interrupt-parent =<&combiner>;
> > > + dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
> >
> > Shouldn't it be "samsung,dp_phy" ?
>
> Do you mean this ? It is not working.
> + dp_phy = "samsung,dp_phy";
I believe he meant:
-+ dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
++ samsung,dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
to mark that this is a Samsung-specific property.
Best regards,
Tomasz Figa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
