Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > > On 08/06/2012 08:27 AM, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: > > After all this discussion, I can see two possibilities here. > > 1] If Kukjin Kim is sure about G-Scaler remains unchanged, across all > > the exynos5 series SoCs, > > It is fine to go with the compatible string "samsung,exynos5-gsc". > > 2] Otherwise in case of any doubts about G-Scaler is going to change, > > It is safe to go with the compatible string specific to > > current SoC i.e., "samsung,exynos5250-gsc". > > > > If we all can agree on this, lets Kukjin Kim decide which string to > > use as he has good knowledge about upcoming exynos5 series SoCs. > > I don't have strong opinion on this, but my vote goes for using more > specific properties. Of course the final word belongs to Mr. Kim. > Thanks, and I will discuss with exynos hardware chip designers about that, then let you know. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |