On Sun, 13 May 2012 15:51:35 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:17:32AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree > > > won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged > > > with the other which isn't ideal. > > > Yes, we would have that problem until the two trees are merged. But I > > still prefer not to squash the two patches which already contain huge > > diff. > > I'd not say the diff is *that* big (and most of what's there is simple > and repetitive), and bisection is a very useful tool. I know I > frequently find it enormously painful trying to figure out breakage when > large chunks of the history don't work usefully. I agree. Squash them! g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |