On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> On 9 May 2012 16:52, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This should've been squashed into the patch that updated to use driver >> > data in order to avoid breaking bisection. > >> This patch updates clock devname in the platform code and the >> modifications to use driver data is in the driver file. So these two >> changes are kept separate to allow them to be applied to their >> respective trees. > > This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree > won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged > with the other which isn't ideal. Yes, we would have that problem until the two trees are merged. But I still prefer not to squash the two patches which already contain huge diff. Thanks, Thomas. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |