Hi Kukjin, On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:33 AM Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Looking at your current fixes-3 branch, it's unclear at a quick glance > > why the clk_type patch is a bugfix, and especially why it is a > > regression fix -- it looks like a cleanup. We're very close to 3.4-rc3 > > I agree that the removing clk_type member in sdhci platform data should > be included in cleanup stuff, it is useless in current mainline though. > > Marek, is this ok to you? Yes, this patch is not strictly needed to get SDHCI working again on v3.4-rcX. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |