On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:50:16PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
>> >> +struct sysmmu_drvdata {
>> >> + struct device *sysmmu;
>> >> + char *dbgname;
>> >> + int nsfrs;
>> >> + void __iomem **sfrbases;
>> >> + struct clk *clk[2];
>> >> + int activations;
>> >> + rwlock_t lock;
>> >> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
>> >> + sysmmu_fault_handler_t fault_handler;
>> >> + unsigned long pgtable;
>> >> + struct iommu_client client;
>> >> +};
>> >
>> > Is there any reason why 'struct iommu_client' is a seperate data
>> > structure? Otherwise it can be merged with 'truct sysmmu_drvdata'.
>
> Of course this doesn't need to be changed immediatly. I just asked if
> there was a specific reason for this seperation.
>
>> The problems will be soon fixed and I will post next patch tomorrow.
>
> Fine. Please also get the Acked-bys from the Exynos maintainer on
> patches 1 and 2 at least. I'll merge it then.
>
Thank you.
AFAIK, Exynos maintainer is somewhat busy for his own job.
I will ask him to ack my patch soon.
Best regards,
Cho KyongHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
