On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:50:16PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> >> +struct sysmmu_drvdata {
> >> + struct device *sysmmu;
> >> + char *dbgname;
> >> + int nsfrs;
> >> + void __iomem **sfrbases;
> >> + struct clk *clk[2];
> >> + int activations;
> >> + rwlock_t lock;
> >> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> >> + sysmmu_fault_handler_t fault_handler;
> >> + unsigned long pgtable;
> >> + struct iommu_client client;
> >> +};
> >
> > Is there any reason why 'struct iommu_client' is a seperate data
> > structure? Otherwise it can be merged with 'truct sysmmu_drvdata'.
Of course this doesn't need to be changed immediatly. I just asked if
there was a specific reason for this seperation.
> The problems will be soon fixed and I will post next patch tomorrow.
Fine. Please also get the Acked-bys from the Exynos maintainer on
patches 1 and 2 at least. I'll merge it then.
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
