On 02/23/12 03:49, Amit Kachhap wrote:
On 23 February 2012 11:54, Rob Lee<rob.lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Hi Mr kim,
Can this change be accommodated in the current patch series as below
or should i send a new patchset?
I did, Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int exynos4_enter_lowpower(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
int index);
-static struct cpuidle_state exynos4_cpuidle_set[] = {
+static struct cpuidle_state exynos4_cpuidle_set[] __initdata = {
[0] = {
.enter = exynos4_enter_idle,
.exit_latency = 1,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
