On Tuesday 10 January 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > I do also wonder if it's worth letting people push stuff to you > more aggressively - right now you seem to be asking people to batch > things up and I wonder if that's making it a it easier for things to end > up dropping on the floor if a time based routine isn't working well for > people. I really wish people would push stuff into arm-soc more aggressively, and I certainly didn't want to give the impression that maintainers should let their stuff sit in linux-next before sending it to us. It's absolutely fine to send multiple updates per branch for arm-soc as stuff comes in, as long as we can keep track of the dependencies and we don't have to rebase the stuff that's already merged. I would also prefer if people stopped having their own trees included in next, but I know that I'm sometimes slow to pick up patches that were submitted to arm-soc and that it helps people if they can get earlier integration testing that way. Hopefully we're also getting better at dealing with pull requests quickly so that there is no need for the other tree in linux-next any more. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |