On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:27:30PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> On 12/12/11, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> + &s5p_device_g2d, > >> > For devices like g2d which are always part of the SoC and which don't >> > require any external wiring on the board I was thinking we should just >> > have the core code for the SoC register the device rather than including >> > it in each board individually. It'd save effort and ensure that people >> > automatically get to use the feature. > >> I'm welcome to use these scheme. make a common.c and register it automatically. >> but I'm not sure we're ready to use this scheme. and I hope to start >> these work at smdk board instead of this patch. > > I'm not sure I understand why we would not be ready to do things like > this? I'd also expect that doing things in a board specific fashion > might create issues with things being set up twice. Please see the below, https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/15/16 Even though I can't agree with his opinions. There are other voice like this. I also want to common registration and select at each board. Thank you, Kyungmin Park > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |