On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:27:30PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On 12/12/11, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> + &s5p_device_g2d, > > For devices like g2d which are always part of the SoC and which don't > > require any external wiring on the board I was thinking we should just > > have the core code for the SoC register the device rather than including > > it in each board individually. It'd save effort and ensure that people > > automatically get to use the feature. > I'm welcome to use these scheme. make a common.c and register it automatically. > but I'm not sure we're ready to use this scheme. and I hope to start > these work at smdk board instead of this patch. I'm not sure I understand why we would not be ready to do things like this? I'd also expect that doing things in a board specific fashion might create issues with things being set up twice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html