On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable() > > > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need > > > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again. > > > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime > > > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove. > > > > > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver. > > > > > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! > > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung > > tree. > > Hi Vinod, > > I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and > second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin > Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply. Okay, I have applied this one only -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |