On Tuesday, December 06, 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:15:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third > > patch > > > > depends on it and there's some other stuff going on with the s3c64xx > > > > power management - so let's see what Kukjin thinks is best. > > > > > OTOH, it will conflict with some patches I have in the works. > > > > Ah, OK - in that case I guess it's sensible if you apply it. Ideally it > > could be on a separate branch so it could be cross-merged with other > > trees if there's a need later. > > Hi Mark and Rafael, > > Looks ok to me on this series and would be nice to me if Rafael could create > topic branch in his tree and apply this series with my ack for Samsung > stuff. > > Rafael, please let me know the branch when you create it so that I can merge > it into Samsung tree to avoid other conflicts. I need an ack from Magnus or Paul on the shmobile patch. When I get one, I'll put patches [1/3] and [2/3] (new version) into my linux-next branch and then (after a few days spent in linux-next) to the pm-domains branch. I'll let you know when that happens. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |