On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:15:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, December 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > > It might make sense for it to go via the Samsung tree - the third patch > > depends on it and there's some other stuff going on with the s3c64xx > > power management - so let's see what Kukjin thinks is best. > OTOH, it will conflict with some patches I have in the works. Ah, OK - in that case I guess it's sensible if you apply it. Ideally it could be on a separate branch so it could be cross-merged with other trees if there's a need later. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |