On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12 October 2011 22:00, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12 October 2011 21:43, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 10/10/2011 03:11 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: >>>> ioremap() request for statically remapped regions are intercepted and the >>>> statically assigned virtual address is returned. For requests for which >>>> there are no statically remapped regions, the requests are let through. >>>> >>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/io.h | 4 ++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>> >>> You won't need this with Nico's vmalloc.h clean-up series. It does >>> exactly this but generically for all platforms. >> >> Ok. Thanks for your suggestion. I will move to using Nico's patches. > > From Nico's reply to his pull request of vmalloc cleanup series, it > looks like that pull request has been withdrawn (hope I am not missing > anything here). Without Nico's series, and gic dt support for exynos4 > support requiring this patch, all other workarounds to replace this > patch does not seem be correct. > > So is it acceptable to retain this patch and later rework/drop the > exynos4 specific ioremap along with Nico's vmalloc patch series when > it is merged. I would say yes, but I don't get to make the decision here. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |