On 12 October 2011 22:00, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12 October 2011 21:43, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/10/2011 03:11 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: >>> ioremap() request for statically remapped regions are intercepted and the >>> statically assigned virtual address is returned. For requests for which >>> there are no statically remapped regions, the requests are let through. >>> >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/io.h | 4 ++++ >>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >> >> You won't need this with Nico's vmalloc.h clean-up series. It does >> exactly this but generically for all platforms. > > Ok. Thanks for your suggestion. I will move to using Nico's patches. >From Nico's reply to his pull request of vmalloc cleanup series, it looks like that pull request has been withdrawn (hope I am not missing anything here). Without Nico's series, and gic dt support for exynos4 support requiring this patch, all other workarounds to replace this patch does not seem be correct. So is it acceptable to retain this patch and later rework/drop the exynos4 specific ioremap along with Nico's vmalloc patch series when it is merged. Thanks, Thomas. > > Regards, > Thomas. > >> >> Rob >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |